Trump Says Iran Rejected US Nuclear Proposal, Iran Demands Sanctions Relief First

Trump Says Iran Rejected US Nuclear Proposal, Iran Demands Sanctions Relief First

Trump says US offered limited enrichment deal, accuses Iran of rejecting diplomatic opportunity presented

Tensions between Iran and the United States have escalated after US President Donald Trump shared a strong message regarding Tehran’s nuclear program through his Truth Social-linked account on X. In the post, Trump described an American proposal aimed at limiting Iran’s uranium enrichment and claimed that Iran had rejected it.

The statement quickly drew a response from Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Majid Takht-Ravanchi, who criticized Washington’s growing military presence in the Middle East and clarified that Iran remains open to negotiations — but only under specific and clear conditions.

What Trump Said

In his post on X, shared from his Truth Social account, Donald Trump described what he called a US proposal presented to Iran. According to him, the United States asked Iran to completely stop uranium enrichment for three to five years. After that period, Iran would be allowed to resume enrichment, but only at a low level of 1.5 percent.

The proposal also required Iran to hand over 400 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60 percent purity. In exchange, the United States would not lift economic sanctions. Instead, Washington would only agree not to carry out military attacks against Iran.

Trump presented this development as breaking news and suggested that Iran had rejected the offer.

Iran Rejects the Proposal

Iranian officials have dismissed the reported proposal, describing it as one-sided and unacceptable. Tehran has consistently stated that uranium enrichment is its sovereign right under international agreements, as long as it is used for peaceful purposes.

Iran strongly opposes halting enrichment completely and surrendering a significant stockpile of enriched uranium without receiving firm and immediate sanctions relief in return. Officials argue that any nuclear agreement must include practical and credible steps to remove economic sanctions that have severely impacted the country.

Also Read: Indira IVF Launches Advanced Fertility Clinic in Hadapsar, Expanding Reach in Pune

Iran Responds to Military Pressure

Deputy Foreign Minister Majid Takht-Ravanchi responded directly to recent US military warnings. He criticized Washington for increasing its military presence in the Middle East and warned that such actions could destabilize the region.

He said that if any aggression takes place, not only Iran but “everybody will suffer.” According to him, war would bring serious and traumatic consequences for all sides. He stressed that expanding military forces in the region would not intimidate Tehran and could instead lead to a wider confrontation.

Iran has repeatedly warned that if conflict breaks out, US bases and forces stationed in the region could become targets. His comments highlight the seriousness of the current situation.

Iran Open to Negotiations With Conditions

Despite rejecting the proposal and condemning military threats, Iran has not shut the door on diplomacy. Takht-Ravanchi confirmed that Tehran is ready to discuss a nuclear deal with the United States.

However, he made it clear that meaningful negotiations can only take place if Washington shows seriousness and goodwill. Iran insists that sanctions relief must be a central part of any agreement. Tehran believes that negotiating while facing economic pressure and military threats undermines trust.

Iran also maintains that nuclear talks should focus strictly on nuclear issues. It opposes expanding discussions to include its ballistic missile program or regional policies.

Background of the Nuclear Dispute

The dispute over Iran’s nuclear program intensified after the United States withdrew from the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action in 2018 and reimposed strict economic sanctions. In response, Iran gradually increased its uranium enrichment levels beyond the limits set under the agreement.

Currently, Iran enriches uranium up to 60 percent purity. This level is significantly higher than the 3.67 percent limit allowed under the original deal and much closer to weapons-grade material. Iran claims that its nuclear operations are for peaceful purposes such as energy generation and medical research. However, the United States and its allies consider the higher enrichment levels a serious proliferation concern.

Talks to Continue Amid High Tensions

Despite sharp statements from both sides, diplomatic channels remain open. A new round of indirect talks between Iran and the United States is scheduled to take place in Geneva, following earlier discussions in Oman. Mediators continue to facilitate communication as both countries avoid direct face-to-face meetings.

Both Washington and Tehran acknowledge that a full-scale war would be disastrous. However, significant disagreements remain, especially over the timing and sequencing of sanctions relief and nuclear restrictions.

Regional and Global Impact

The ongoing standoff has wider implications for the Middle East and the global community. Countries in the region fear instability that could disrupt oil supplies, trade routes and overall security. Nations such as Israel and several Gulf states closely monitor Iran’s nuclear progress with concern.

The outcome of the current negotiations will play a major role in shaping regional stability, global energy markets and international non-proliferation efforts.

Also Read: ‘Betrayal of Farmers’: Rahul Gandhi Attacks Centre Over India-US Trade Deal

Conclusion

Donald Trump’s post has intensified the already fragile nuclear dispute between Iran and the United States. Iran has rejected the reported American proposal and warned against military escalation. At the same time, Tehran has expressed conditional readiness for negotiations, provided that sanctions relief and mutual respect form the foundation of any agreement.

As indirect talks move forward, the international community continues to watch closely to see whether diplomacy can overcome deep mistrust and prevent further escalation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *